Billy Madison: six out of six.
One of my favourite comedies.
Blades of Glory: five out of six.
Great movie, just a humour drought in the middle.
X-Men: The Last Stand: three out of six.
Worth a look, but maybe the most average movie I've ever seen.
Lord of the Rings: The Fellowship of the Ring: two out of six.
Good story development, but I could care less about the story itself.
Lord of the Rings: The Two Towers: three out of six.
I don't know if Frodo and Sam ARE gay,
but the shoddy acting gives that apperance.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
7 comments:
Wow, lord of the rings 2 and 3 out of six? you say shoddy acting? dude look at the awards the acting got so stfu.
"werst review evurrrr"
Yo mat it's D. it wasn't me that wasn't me who posted shit about stuff, if i did you would see my blogspot site link.
Pretty cocky shit here, what awards did clover fireld get. Now compare that do the extensive portfolio of the Lord of the rings trilogy.
the first one was probably chris b/c it says wow at the beginning
OK, Anonymous, if a bunch of awards told you to jump off a cliff, would you do it?
I prefered Cloverfield to both those movies combined, the point of a review is to express MY opinion, not be fucking unanimous with what everyone else thinks. Deal with it.
Nope wasn't me that posted, because it doesnt let me post comments in firefox and im too lazy to open internet explorer lol.
Post a Comment